|
Appendix 1
Support Kent Schools
The Kent secondary picture:
SKS supports the performance of all Kent secondary schools; the viability
of grammar schools hinges on the success of the whole secondary system,
which in Kent is a success story.
Kent LEA has the combination of significant deprivation (99th /148 on
Ofsted multiple deprivation index), together with the typical difficulties
of the Southeast in recruitment, retention and costs, plus extraordinary
pressures on the schools system from asylum-seekers and looked-after
children (800 imported from other authorities).
The primary baseline:
The Primary phase in Kent has struggled over decades to raise
its achievement, after a history of inadequate pre-school provision,
but still at KS1 and KS2 Kent is performing below both the national
average and Statistical Neighbours: Kent 9th/9 at KS 2 in 1999(Table
1)., 8th/9 in 2002 (Table 2).
|
TABLE
1 ranked by: 1999 KS2 3-subject average % of pupils gaining
Level 4+ |
TABLE
2, ranked by: 2002 KS2
av. Pts. SCORE |
|
Gloucestershire
|
74.7 |
|
Gloucestershire
|
28.0 |
|
West
Sussex |
74.3 |
|
West
Sussex |
27.6 |
|
Lancashire |
74.1 |
|
Nottinghamshire |
27.6 |
|
Essex |
73.2 |
|
Essex |
27.5 |
|
Northamptonshire |
73.1 |
|
Lancashire |
27.5 |
|
Bedfordshire |
72.7 |
|
England |
27.4 |
| England |
71.9 |
|
Northamptonshire |
27.4 |
|
Worcestershire |
71.8 |
|
Worcestershire |
27.3 |
|
Nottinghamshire |
71.4 |
|
Kent |
27.2 |
| Kent |
71.2 |
|
Bedfordshire |
27.2 |
87% of the schools in special measures or serious weaknesses in Kent
are in the primary phase.
It is on this platform of experience and attainment in the primary phase,
that the secondary phase starts its work.
The Secondary statistics:
Kent has a diverse secondary system (33 GS, 18 comprehensive,
52 “High” ie Secondary Modern). Kent often suffers from
inappropriate statistical comparisons against comprehensive norms. Owing
to the high proportion of selective and non-selective schools, different
bases for comparison are needed. The innovation of Value-Added comparative
statistics is particularly helpful in analysing the achievement of such
a diverse sector.
Kent is at the top of its statistical neighbours in tackling KS3 (Table
3)
|
TABLE
3 ranked by:
KS3 Value
Added
|
| Kent |
100.6 |
|
Essex |
100.6 |
|
West
Sussex |
100.1 |
|
Bedfordshire |
100.1 |
|
Nottinghamshire |
100.1 |
|
Gloucestershire
|
100.0 |
|
Northamptonshire |
100.0 |
|
Worcestershire |
99.9 |
| England |
99.8 |
| Lancashire |
99.5 |
The pre-selection of pupils by ability enables secondary schools to
home in quickly on their new pupils and provide teaching tuned accurately
to their needs; Both GS and SM in Kent manage the transition to secondary
school better than the typical comprehensive setting, where the pupils
may easily fail to signal their individual capabilities for 6 months
or a year. The manageable size of Year 7, even in our biggest secondary
schools (only 20% are larger than 1000), contributes to the rapid settling
in and quicker engagement in constructive learning. Thus the diverse
system in Kent is in fact a strength.
Having made that impressive start in KS3 to their secondary careers,
Kent pupils maintain their position through KS4 (Table 4 and 5: ranked
by scores).
|
TABLE
4: ranked by:
KS3 av. pts. SCORE
|
|
TABLE
5: ranked by:
KS4
GCSE
av pts. SCORE
|
|
West
Sussex |
35.8 |
|
Gloucestershire
|
38.2 |
|
Gloucestershire
|
35.2 |
|
West
Sussex |
35.8 |
| Kent |
34.8 |
|
Kent |
35.7 |
|
Lancashire |
34.3 |
|
Essex |
35.5 |
|
Essex |
34.2 |
|
Lancashire |
35.3 |
|
Worcestershire |
34.1 |
|
England |
34.7 |
|
Bedfordshire |
33.9 |
|
Bedfordshire |
34.6 |
| England |
33.7 |
|
Worcestershire |
34.3 |
|
Northamptonshire |
33.7 |
|
Northamptonshire |
34.2 |
| Nottinghamshire |
33.2 |
|
Nottinghamshire |
33.2 |
Schools and LEAs find it harder (for statistical reasons) to demonstrate
value-added at KS4 when they have already added high value in the previous
Key Stage; statistical neighbours catch up with Kent in adding value to
their KS3 achievement, (Table 6)
|
TABLE
6: ranked by:
KS4 Value Added |
|
Northamptonshire |
100 |
|
Essex |
99.6 |
|
Lancashire |
98.9 |
|
Bedfordshire |
98.9 |
|
West
Sussex |
98.7 |
|
Gloucestershire
|
98.5 |
| England |
98.5 |
|
Worcestershire |
98.4 |
|
Nottinghamshire |
98.4 |
| Kent |
98 |
but Kent retains its high ranking among statistical neighbours of 3rd/
9 at KS4. (Table 5).
Conclusion:
The overall picture is of a secondary system in Kent which,
although complex to administer, demonstrates impressive recovery from
a low baseline primary attainment and, because selection enables accurate
matching of provision to pupils, answers the challenge of the “KS3
dip” better than comparable systems and builds up to a high position
among its statistical neighbours.
Notes on figures:
Anthony Stanton, Support Kent Schools 12 May, 2003
1
|