Support Kent Schools

Back to News Information
	Opponents of selective education want to introduce COMPREHENSIVE EDUCATION.

QUESTION	What do they mean by "comprehensive education"?

QUESTION	Will we see NEIGHBOURHOOD COMPREHENSIVES with children directed to attend one school - and only one school?

QUESTION	Will we see A MIXED ECONOMY: some 11-16 schools with a few 11-18 schools - the only schools offering a Sixth Form curriculum? Past experience shows 11-18 schools are more attractive to teaching staff.

QUESTION	Will we see all post-16 teaching handed over to the Further Education sector with NO SIXTH FORM provision at all in our schools?

QUESTION	Will we see ALL SCHOOLS CO-EDUCATIONAL? Many parents prefer single sex education. Will it survive?

	The Government will expect Local Education Authorities to fund reorganisation THEMSELVES.

QUESTION	Are Kent, Medway or Bexley LEAs so flush with CASH that they could afford a major programme of reorganisation?

	Abolishing Grammar Schools WILL NOT end selection.

QUESTION	Why is selection acceptable on the basis of APTITUDE (as promoted by the Government's specialist schools programme - technology, art, sport etc.)? Why is it also acceptable on the basis of RELIGIOUS AFFILIATION but UNACCEPTABLE on the basis of ACADEMIC ABILITY?

QUESTION	Popular and over-subscribed schools will continue to SELECT their pupils - BUT ON WHAT CRITERIA?

	ACADEMICALLY ABLE PUPILS in inner city comprehensives have been SELECTED FOR EXTRA TUITION.

QUESTION	If comprehensive schools are the answer to all our problems WHY is this provision necessary?

QUESTION	Indeed if comprehensive education is the great success some say it is, WHY does the government continue to be so concerned about standards in education?

	Government legislation was enacted in 1998 and has presented an opportunity for a petition to be raised which could lead to a ballot on the future of grammar schools. To date there have been no successful campaigns.
	The arguments for comprehensive education and against the selective system have been on SOCIAL and POLITICAL GROUNDS..... NOT EDUCATIONAL ONES
	Medway Local Education Authority (LEA) is currently spending LESS on education than the Government says it should........ *SO WHO IS GOING TO PAY THE MASSIVE* REORGANISTION COSTS?**
	In a recent telephone poll conducted by the Kent Messenger newspaper, 2% of respondents wished to see selective education abolished.
	The government continues to encourage the development of "Specialist Schools" selecting pupils with aptitudes from technology.... for sport....for art.....for music..... FOR ANYTHING ....EXCEPT ACADEMIC ABILITY OF COURSE!